In the realm of professional management , there are acts of wrongdoing that fly under the radar , and then there are stories that put a spotlight on moral failures. The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia (formerly Broadspectrum) , is a perfect example of the latter — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that not only taints the reputation of a single manager but calls into question over the enterprise’s integrity.
In spite of numerous complaints, Collins has kept his position , visibly unaffected by the furor surrounding him . How has this been enabled to go on ? What does this say about the organization’s ethos of integrity? As per the accounts of those familiar, Collins’ history of improper behavior began with breaches of the business principles, but it didn’t conclude at that point . Instead, it intensified into a cascade of dubious behaviors that has left fellow employees demoralized and partners bewildered .
During a leadership training program —ironically aimed at enhancing leadership qualities —David Collins allegedly transformed what should have been a development chance into a series of additional resources reckless events . Allegations indicate he spent organization-paid excursions pursuing romantic liaisons , a glaring violation of Ventia’s business principles , all while his household stayed oblivious .
But the impropriety didn’t conclude with these encounters . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to distribute inappropriate images to women—a clear misuse of professional tools and a destruction of integrity. His bold misuse of Microsoft Teams to transmit inappropriate content —including emojis to brag about extramarital affairs — exposes a personality of a man unconcerned with the consequences . Following these digital flirtations , Collins allegedly escalated his behavior further: he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on repeated times during business days , despite his relationship status and her having a spouse . This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources not only violated professional boundaries but led to familial breakdowns — leaving a path of mistrust that extended past the workplace .
How can this behavior be enabled to continue ? Why is it that a manager who has allegedly overstepped every rule is still kerikeri ventia receiving a paycheck at Ventia? The rationale, it appears, stems from a problematic dearth of accountability within the firm . Concerns have been voiced, yet Collins operates without restraint .
This lack of consequence conveys a risky precedent : that title and position within the firm can serve as a safeguard. It promotes a hostile office atmosphere , discourages team members, and ultimately harms the company’s standing .